Evolution of C(4) phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in the genus Alternanthera: gene families and the enzymatic characteristics of the C(4) isozyme and its orthologues in C(3) and C(3)/C(4) Alternantheras.

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCase, EC 4.1.1.3) is a key enzyme of C(4) photosynthesis. It has evolved from ancestral non-photosynthetic (C(3)) isoforms and thereby changed its kinetic and regulatory properties. We are interested in understanding the molecular changes, as the C(4) PEPCases were adapted to their new function in C(4) photosynthesis and have therefore analysed the PEPCase genes of various Alternanthera species. We isolated PEPCase cDNAs from the C(4) plant Alternanthera pungens H.B.K., the C(3)/C(4) intermediate plant A. tenella Colla, and the C(3) plant A. sessilis (L.) R.Br. and investigated the kinetic properties of the corresponding recombinant PEPCase proteins and their phylogenetic relationships. The three PEPCases are most likely derived from orthologous gene classes named ppcA. The affinity constant for the substrate phosphoenolpyruvate (K (0.5) PEP) and the degree of activation by glucose-6-phosphate classified the enzyme from A. pungens (C(4)) as a C(4) PEPCase isoform. In contrast, both the PEPCases from A. sessilis (C(3)) and A. tenella (C(3)/C(4)) were found to be typical C(3) PEPCase isozymes. The C(4) characteristics of the PEPCase of A. pungens were accompanied by the presence of the C(4)-invariant serine residue at position 775 reinforcing that a serine at this position is essential for being a C(4) PEPCase (Svensson et al. 2003). Genomic Southern blot experiments and sequence analysis of the 3' untranslated regions of these genes indicated the existence of PEPCase multigene family in all three plants which can be grouped into three classes named ppcA, ppcB and ppcC.

Sample selection for microarray gene expression studies.

OBJECTIVES: The choice of biomedical samples for microarray gene expression studies is decisive for both validity and interpretability of results. We present a consistent, comprehensive framework to deal with the typical selection problems in microarray studies. METHODS: Microarray studies are designed either as case-control studies or as comparisons of parallel groups from cohort studies, since high levels of random variation in the experimental approach thwart absolute measurements of gene expression levels. Validity and results of gene expression studies heavily rely on the appropriate choice of these study groups. Therefore, the so-called principles of comparability, which are well known from both clinical and epidemiological studies, need to be applied to microarray experiments. RESULTS: The principles of comparability are the study-base principle, the principle of deconfounding and the principle of comparable accuracy in measurements. We explain each of these principles, show how they apply to microarray experiments, and illustrate them with examples. The examples are chosen as to represent typical stumbling blocks of microarray experimental design, and to exemplify the benefits of implementing the principles of comparability in the setting of microarray experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Microarray studies are closely related to classical study designs and therefore have to obey the same principles of comparability as these. Their validity should not be compromised by selection, confounding or information bias. The so-called study-base principle, calling for comparability and thorough definition of the compared cell populations, is the key principle for the choice of biomedical samples and controls in microarray studies.

Evolution of C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in Flaveria, a conserved serine residue in the carboxyl-terminal part of the enzyme is a major determinant for C4-specific characteristics.

C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylases have evolved from ancestral C3 isoforms during the evolution of angiosperms and gained distinct kinetic and regulatory properties compared with the C3 isozymes. To identify amino acid residues and/or domains responsible for these C4-specific properties the C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase of Flaveria trinervia (C4) was compared with its orthologue in the closely related C3 plant Flaveria pringlei. Reciprocal enzyme chimera were constructed and the kinetic constants, K(0.5) and k(cat), as well as the Hill coefficient, h, were determined for the substrate phosphoenolpyruvate both in the presence and absence of the activator glucose 6-phosphate. By this approach two regions were identified which determined most of the kinetic differences of the C4 and C3 ppcA phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylases with respect to the substrate PEP. In addition, the experiments suggest that the two regions do not act additively but interact with each other. The region between amino acids 296 and 437 is essential for activation by glucose 6-phosphate. The carboxyl-terminal segment between amino acids 645 and 966 contains a C4 conserved serine or a C3 invariant alanine at position 774 in the respective enzyme isoform. Site-directed mutagenesis shows that this position is a key determinant for the kinetic properties of the two isozymes.

Evolution of the enzymatic characteristics of C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase--a comparison of the orthologous PPCA phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylases of Flaveria trinervia (C4) and Flaveria pringlei (C3).

C4 phosphoenolpyruvate (P-pyruvate) carboxylases have evolved from ancestral C3 P-pyruvate carboxylases during the evolution of C4 photosynthesis (Lepiniec et al., 1994). To meet the requirements of a new metabolic pathway, the C4 enzymes have gained distinct kinetic and regulatory properties compared to C3 enzymes. Our interest is to deduce the structure responsible for these C4-specific properties. As a model system, the orthologous ppcA P-pyruvate carboxylases of Flaveria trinervia (C4) and Flaveria pringlei (C3) were investigated by expressing them in Escherichia coli using their cDNAs. The K(m) (P-pyruvate) was about ten times higher for the C4 enzyme (650 microM) than for the C3 enzyme (60 microM). The activation by glucose 6-phosphate, which was shown by a decrease in the K(m) (P-pyruvate), was about twice for the C4 enzyme and three times for the C3 enzyme. The C3 enzyme showed a very high sensitivity to L-malate with an I(0.5) (50% inhibition) value of 80 microM malate, whereas the C4 enzyme was much less sensitive with a I(0.5) value of 1.2 mM malate. To locate the structural positions responsible for these differences in kinetic and regulatory properties, chimeras of these 95% identical enzymes were made. In this study, the first 437 residues of the 966-amino-acid protein were interchanged. The results showed that the N-terminal part of the enzyme was responsible for a small but significant part of the kinetic difference observed between these two isoenzymes. Additionally, the results suggest that the N-terminus was the site for glucose 6-phosphate activation and was also responsible for the observed difference in activation by this sugar phosphate. The difference in inhibition by L-malate, however, is suggested to originate mainly from the C-terminal part of the enzyme.